See Order Info Example

See Order Info Example See Order Info – Coursework Example Ethics What Would Be The Dilemma And The Implications Of Such A Crime On The Individual, The Family, The Community, And Society Stealing is a crime, which affects the life of individual, family as well as the society. As per the norms of society, any kind of stealing is considered a punishable offence. Similarly, stealing food is a crime and people who are involved into this type of crime should be punishable by law because it affects the life of other people within society and community. The dilemma that is associated with the provided crime scenario is noted to be largely affecting the overall needs of family members, society and community. Rather the basic needs of an individual and stealing for fulfilling such needs can be a serious issue as the person who is involved in this type of crime reflects on his criminal tendencies (FAO Org, 2012). However, in the provided case the purpose of stealing is to arrange the food for the family members and fulfill their basic needs, which is stated as the fundamental duty of the individual. Therefore, in this case it is can be stated that there is a huge amount of moral underpinnings associated with the same. Thus, it is evident from the case scenario a huge amount of dilemma that is associated with meeting the basic needs of the individuals. Rather it is evident that at the ethical grounds meeting with the basic needs of the family is a fundamental duty of the individual whereas taking jurisdiction view the same is punishable before law. Hence, it could be termed that the act that is committed by the individual is noted to be ethically correct whereas the same is violating the needs of legal bindings associated with the same for the overall progression of the society as well as the community (FAO Org, 2012). ReferenceFAO Org. (2012). Social protection of food security. Community on World Food Security, 7-95. See Order Info Example See Order Info – Coursework Example The Affordable Care Act Important Elements of the Affordable Care Act In Relation To Community and Public Health The ‘Affordable Care Act’, which introduced by the US President Barack Obama, possesses certain special attributes. A few of them include free of cost preventive care, discount on the medicinal value for the elders and ensuring providing effective as well as quality care to the patients. Above all, in relation to community and public health, one of the important constituents of the Affordable Care Act is recognized as that it enables free medical coverage for the children until they reach 26 years of age. The Act has been playing a decisive role in the transformation of the existing healthcare system in the nation. Justifiably, the ‘American Nurses Association’ (ANA) has designed a chart based upon the guidelines of the Act, which provides detailed understanding about the recent changes made in the field of healthcare and their implications for fu ture. Apart from this, adopting effective measures towards safeguarding against healthcare fraud is deemed to be the other important element of the above discussed Act (Hall, 2011). Role of the Nurse in Implementing the Affordable Care ActFor the implementation of the Affordable Care Act, the job of the nurses is deemed to be much vital, as their roles are multi-faceted. It has been quite evident that healthcare nurses provide expert treatment services and education to the people who are entitled to receive the same. On the other hand, school nurses promote health prevention measures amid the students of distinct schools. Occupational healthcare nurses are involved in monitoring, promoting and working over environment related concerns. Correctional nurses engage in offering medical services to the prisoners in jail (American Nurses Association, Inc., 2014). Thus, by segregating the job tasks of the various nurses’ type, their role in executing the stated Act can be determined . ReferencesAmerican Nurses Association, Inc. (2014). Health care transformation: The Affordable Care Act and more. Retrieved from nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/Policy-Advocacy/HealthSystemReform/AffordableCareAct.pdfHall, M. A. (2011). Risk adjustment under the Affordable Care Act: A guide for federal and state regulators. Issue Brief, 7, 1-11. See Order Info Example See Order Info – Coursework Example Response Paper of Learning Response Paper I did like this article, because it focuses on the problem of seriously ill people. The author considers extremely important issue, namely the issue of futile treatment. Futile treatment is understood as a treatment that is not effective for the patient and as a result, the patient is forced to experience excruciating pain. In fact, futile treatment is often associated with moral dilemmas. Despite the constant development of modern science, medicine still cannot offer an effective treatment for all human diseases. Many patients have to experience serious suffering for the simple reason that the medicine cannot give them an effective treatment able to stop their suffering. In this regard, not only medical staff but also family members of the patient are faced with a serious dilemma. They have to decide whether it makes sense to continue the senseless treatment while their relative is experiencing terrible suffering and asks to save him/her fro m them. The situation is extremely difficult and painful. The relatives of the patient have to give him/her the opportunity to die in peace while it suggests a hasty farewell with the loved one. The value of this amazing article is that it draws attention to the psychological complexity of the situation. The author emphasizes the special role of medical students who should provide psychological assistance to both the patient and his/her relatives. This task is extremely important because a medical student is the mediator between the two sides and he/she should help both sides reach an agreement. In this regard, the work of medical students is very stressful.ReferencesLi, M. (2012). Dealing with futile treatment: A medical students perspective. Australian Medical Student Journal, 3(2), 58-60.

Google Services Privacy and Security Concerns

Google Services Privacy and Security Concerns Insecure Digital World In today’s digital world, the debate surrounding privacy and security cannot be stressed further. Internet users are at a constant risk of privacy and security violations by technology companies. Google Inc. is among the biggest tech companies today with billions of people around the world using its services. Nonetheless, these services have developed numerous concerns surrounding privacy and security. Google services such as Street View does not just take pictures but collects email and WIFI information from unsuspecting users nearby. These warring revelations illustrate an increased concern for privacy and security of users. Numerous Google services continue to violate privacy and security rights of users by not informing them that their information is being collected without their consent. Google Collects Info from People Who May Even not Be Using Their Services Google services violate privacy and security rights by accessing and collecting data from people who may even not be using their services. Rosenfeld states that Google admitted to collecting data and personal information from computers inside homes and buildings using their Google Street View cars that were thought to only take pictures for the service. The type of information collected included private information, emails, and passwords all from unsuspicious users. This tends to be a form of security concern since Google does not seek the consent of users before accessing their information. Moreover, it violates privacy rights as well as acts in an unethical manner by illegally accessing and collecting information from users who are even not using their services. Moreover, Google’s Gmail service was also found to be violating federal wiretap regulations. This is because the email service evaluates the content of all emails on its network using the information to sell it as of fshoots to advertisers. For instance, it is possible if one sends frequent emails about cars they are likely to get advertisements related to cars. Google did not make a point of informing Gmail users that it would collect and create individual profiles and target them with adverts. Again, even people who were sending messages to Gmail addresses did not agree for Google to analyze and use their messages for target advertising. Analyzing each and every message is a clear violation of privacy rights since each person is entitled to his/her privacy. Furthermore, by analyzing all kinds of emails, it is not clear how secure the services are since other people be it Google employees may access sensitive information. The Internet Has Been Overly Commercialized Google is also notorious for illegal tracking of its users who access the Internet. In 2012, Google was exposed for using an illegal code to by-pass anti-tracking abilities of Apple’s Safari browser. The secret and illegal code exposed millions of Safari browser to tracking without their knowledge even if they had turned on the anti-tracking abilities. Eventually, Google was found to have committed a privacy violation and fined $22.5 million by the Federal Trade Commission. The idea of well-respected multinational using secret codes just to track users clearly raises concerns in terms of security and privacy. Google clearly acted unethically in using secret codes without users being aware of tracking their online activities. This means that the company can go to any lengths to pursue its business objectives at the expense of user privacy rights and security. Illegal Collection of WIFI Passwords An additional issue is the illegal collection of WIFI passwords from millions of Android phone users. The company was exposed for collecting WIFI passwords for Android users who backed up their phones and allowed the Google service to restore their new phones. This means that Google knows nearly all WIFI passwords in the world. This is a clear violation of privacy since passwords and other vital information is deemed private and may indeed result in privacy and security concerns when accessed by companies such as Google. In its defense, Google has cited that the company was exploited by top U.S spymasters who illegally collected information without user consent. However, these are mere allegations that have no evidence, but the evidence of privacy and security violations can be proven beyond reasonable doubt. In conclusion, Google services continue to violate privacy and security rights of users by not informing them that their information is being collected without their consent. Some Google services can spy, pry, and secretly track information and user activities online. This tends to create increased concern for privacy and security of users. These issues may be far from resolving as even more advanced Google services are being launched. All stakeholders and mostly users have the obligation to determine where the red line lies to address privacy and security concerns.